Archived Comments
whosyourhuckleberry ~
I couldn't help but notice that 1960 was missin fromt he mix...and knowing as I do many of the mores of the era, I am left to assume that there just wasn't any underwear at all...
Jan 05, 2007 00:42
Taylor ~
I didn't noticed that. You might have a point there. Free love and going al fresco - yeah, that must be the reason for no 60s hanging on the line.
Jan 05, 2007 01:32
Erik ~
At that rate, by 2010 there wont be anything. This is both good and a little terrifying.
Jan 05, 2007 01:50
Difster ~
No, Difster, I am not going to model these either...
And I thought this was going to be a good year!
Jan 05, 2007 03:17
Res Ipsa ~
She doesn't need to model ALL of them, just 2006 would be fine.
Jan 05, 2007 05:01
Taylor ~
I better just smile and shut up. Should have known that I was asking for it when I posted this...
Note to self: no more pantie posts.
Jan 05, 2007 07:55
Roci ~
Hopefully, those did not all belong to the same woman.
Jan 05, 2007 19:35
Taylor ~
Didn't want to mention this really, but... I have it on good authority that they are all Madame Pelosi's. 2007's style will be boxer shorts - a long-time favorite of Hillary Clinton's.
Jan 05, 2007 19:55
farmer Tom ~
The very thought of that wench wearing that thing makes me near cleaning solvent for my brain. Dear God what a horrible picture. Now Taylor wearing it, that has real potential.
Ok, now I have to go confess to the wife. Will you please knock it off. I have enough trouble with my thought life.
Jan 06, 2007 05:18
Taylor ~
OK, I'll knock it off. From now on I'll stick to politics, religion, current events. No more posts even remotely touching on panties, bras, garter belts, stockings, stiletto heels, see-through frilly things, etc, etc. Promise. :)
Jan 06, 2007 09:47
Difster ~
No more posts even remotely touching on panties, bras, garter belts, stockings, stiletto heels, see-through frilly things, etc, etc.
A crying shame that is for us single gents.
Jan 06, 2007 11:38
No comments :
Post a Comment